
Celeron N2910

Pentium 8500
Celeron N2910 vs Pentium 8500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N2910 vs Pentium 8500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N2910 vs Pentium 8500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N2910
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 9W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (210 vs 1,250).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (700 vs 2,100).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1170, while Pentium 8500 moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
Pentium 8500
2022Why buy it
- ✅+495.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1170 and older memory support.
- ✅250% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Celeron N2910 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 9W vs 7W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium 8500 better than Celeron N2910?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2910 vs Pentium 8500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910
The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 8500
The Pentium 8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,900 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 8500 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Pentium 8500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 4.4 GHz on the Pentium 8500 — a 93.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 8500 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 8500 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Pentium 8500's 2,900 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N2910. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 1,250, a 142.5% lead for the Pentium 8500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 700 vs 2,100 (100% advantage for the Pentium 8500). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 8 MB (total) on the Pentium 8500.
| Feature | Celeron N2910 | Pentium 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 5 / 6+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+175% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz+60% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,907 | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 210 | 1,250+495% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 700 | 2,100+200% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 8500 uses FCBGA1781 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 versus LPDDR5-5200 on the Pentium 8500 — the Pentium 8500 supports 387.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 8500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2910) vs 14 (Pentium 8500) — the Pentium 8500 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2910) and SoC (Pentium 8500).
| Feature | Celeron N2910 | Pentium 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1781 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | LPDDR5-5200+388% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 14+250% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2910) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium 8500). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) and Intel UHD Graphics (48 EU) (Pentium 8500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop, Pentium 8500 targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210.
| Feature | Celeron N2910 | Pentium 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Intel UHD Graphics (48 EU) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Entry Level Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













