Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4300M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4300M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,932 vs 2,960).

Core i5-4300M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $227 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P8800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300M better than Core 2 Duo P8800?

Yes. Core i5-4300M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4300M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4300M is the better buy right now. Core i5-4300M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $227 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

Core i5-4300M

The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4300M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8800 scores 2,932 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-4300M. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4300M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8800	Core i5-4300M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz	3.3 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+2%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	3 MB	256K (per core)+8433%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,932	2,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.