Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-3380M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-3380M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-3380M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3380M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,932 vs 2,938).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3380M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-3380M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core 2 Duo P8800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3380M better than Core 2 Duo P8800?

Yes. Core i5-3380M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3380M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3380M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3380M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3380M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3380M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-3380M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

Core i5-3380M

The Core i5-3380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,938 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3380M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3380M — a 30% clock advantage for the Core i5-3380M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3380M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8800 scores 2,932 against the Core i5-3380M's 2,938 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-3380M. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3380M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8800	Core i5-3380M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz	3.6 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz	2.9 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	3 MB	256K (per core)+8433%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,932	2,938
Geekbench 6 Single	—	700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-3380M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8800	Core i5-3380M
Socket	PGA478	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo P8800) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3380M). The Core i5-3380M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3380M targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3380M rivals AMD A10-4600M.