A10-5800K vs Core 2 Duo P8800

A10-5800K vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Performance Spectrum

A10-5800K

4 / 4

2,963

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo P8800

2 / 2

2,932

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800K vs Core 2 Duo P8800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800K vs Core 2 Duo P8800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core 2 Duo P8800 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo P8800.

Trade-offs

❌3233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 100W, a 97W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,932 vs 2,963).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5800K better than Core 2 Duo P8800?

Yes. A10-5800K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5800K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5800K still makes the most sense overall. A10-5800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5800K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5800K vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 — a 44.9% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A10-5800K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800K scores 2,963 against the Core 2 Duo P8800's 2,932 — a 1.1% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800K vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800.

Feature	A10-5800K	Core 2 Duo P8800
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+58%	2.66 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+43%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3 MB+200%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,963+1%	2,932
Geekbench 6 Single	461	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800K	Core 2 Duo P8800
Socket	FM2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800K) / not specified (Core 2 Duo P8800). The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.