A10-5800K vs Core i5-4300M

A10-5800K vs Core i5-4300M Performance Spectrum

A10-5800K

4 / 4

2,963

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300M

2 / 4

2,960

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800K vs Core i5-4300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800K vs Core i5-4300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800K

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core i5-4300M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4300M.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4300M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,960 vs 2,963).
❌Launch MSRP is still $227 MSRP, while A10-5800K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5800K better than Core i5-4300M?

Yes. A10-5800K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5800K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5800K is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $227 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4300M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5800K vs Core i5-4300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i5-4300M

The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 24% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A10-5800K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800K scores 2,963 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800K vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4300M.

Feature	A10-5800K	Core i5-4300M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+27%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,963	2,960
Geekbench 6 Single	461	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800K	Core i5-4300M
Socket	FM2	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800K) / not specified (Core i5-4300M). The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core i5-4300M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.