A10-5800K vs Athlon X4 760K

A10-5800K vs Athlon X4 760K Performance Spectrum

A10-5800K

4 / 4

2,963

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800K vs Athlon X4 760K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800K vs Athlon X4 760K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800K

2012

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Athlon X4 760K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (461 vs 495).
❌Lower PassMark (2,963 vs 2,982).

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅+7.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A10-5800K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 760K better than A10-5800K?

Yes. Athlon X4 760K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 760K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 760K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 760K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 760K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 760K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5800K vs Athlon X4 760K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-5800K and Athlon X4 760K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K versus 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K — a 2.4% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The A10-5800K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 760K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800K scores 2,963 against the Athlon X4 760K's 2,982 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon X4 760K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 461 vs 495, a 7.1% lead for the Athlon X4 760K that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-5800K	Athlon X4 760K
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+2%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,963	2,982
Geekbench 6 Single	461	495+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,404

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FM2 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800K) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K).

Feature	A10-5800K	Athlon X4 760K
Socket	FM2	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-5800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget, Athlon X4 760K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.