Athlon II X4 620e vs Core 2 Duo P8800

Athlon II X4 620e vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 620e

4 / 4

2,906

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo P8800

2 / 2

2,932

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Core 2 Duo P8800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Core 2 Duo P8800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 620e

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,906 vs 2,932).
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P8800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1400% higher power demand at 45W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 620e across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 620e better than Core 2 Duo P8800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X4 620e is ahead with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X4 620e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 620e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo P8800 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X4 620e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620e

The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 620e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 620e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8800 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620e scores 2,906 against the Core 2 Duo P8800's 2,932 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620e vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800.

Feature	Athlon II X4 620e	Core 2 Duo P8800
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	3 MB+500%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Propus (2009−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,906	2,932

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 620e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.