
Athlon II X4 620e

Core i5-2500T
Athlon II X4 620e vs Core i5-2500T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 620e vs Core i5-2500T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 620e vs Core i5-2500T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 620e
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $83 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.4 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,906 vs 2,929).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2500T
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Athlon II X4 620e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 29.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2500T better than Athlon II X4 620e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 620e vs Core i5-2500T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620e
The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-2500T
The Core i5-2500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,929 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 620e and Core i5-2500T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2500T — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2500T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620e scores 2,906 against the Core i5-2500T's 2,929 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-2500T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620e vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Core i5-2500T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+13% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,906 | 2,929 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 620e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2500T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X4 620e) vs 16 (Core i5-2500T) — the Core i5-2500T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Core i5-2500T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 620e) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2500T). The Core i5-2500T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Athlon II X4 620e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Core i5-2500T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 2000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 620e was priced at $99, while the Core i5-2500T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($99 vs $182), Athlon II X4 620e was $83 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620e delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500T — making the Athlon II X4 620e the 58.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Core i5-2500T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-46% | $182 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.4+83% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















