
Core 2 Duo SP9400

Core i5-2450M
Core 2 Duo SP9400 vs Core i5-2450M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo SP9400 vs Core i5-2450M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo SP9400 vs Core i5-2450M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo SP9400
2008Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (340 vs 453).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (600 vs 871).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2450M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2450M
2012Why buy it
- ✅+33.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Duo SP9400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo SP9400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2450M better than Core 2 Duo SP9400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo SP9400 vs Core i5-2450M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SP9400
The Core 2 Duo SP9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,083 points. Launch price was $284.

Core i5-2450M
The Core i5-2450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $823.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SP9400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2450M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9400 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2450M — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-2450M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SP9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2450M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9400 scores 2,083 against the Core i5-2450M's 2,076 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo SP9400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 340 vs 453, a 28.5% lead for the Core i5-2450M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 600 vs 871 (36.8% advantage for the Core i5-2450M). L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9400 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2450M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9400 | Core i5-2450M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 256K (per core)+4167% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,083 | 2,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,352 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 340 | 453+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 600 | 871+45% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SP9400 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2450M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SP9400 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2450M — the Core i5-2450M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2450M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Core 2 Duo SP9400) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2450M).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9400 | Core i5-2450M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SP9400) vs true (Core i5-2450M). The Core i5-2450M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo SP9400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SP9400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo SP9400 rivals Athlon II X2 245e; Core i5-2450M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9400 | Core i5-2450M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | GMA X4500HD | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













