Core 2 Duo T5270
VS
A4-6300

Core 2 Duo T5270 vs A4-6300

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A4-6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5270 is positioned at rank 47 and the A4-6300 is on rank 708, so the Core 2 Duo T5270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5270

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
100%
#35
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
206%
#36
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
203%
#37
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
186%
#38
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
185%
#39
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
183%
#41
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
177%
#42
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
170%
#43
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
170%
#44
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
165%
#47
Core 2 Duo T5270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13026%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12308%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8937%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2692%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2133%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1866%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1069%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1055%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
960%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
960%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
949%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
924%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
911%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
907%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
899%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
99%
#708
A4-6300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
99%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
99%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
99%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
98%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
98%
#716
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
98%
#717
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
98%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
98%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
98%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
98%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
97%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-6300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5270 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5270A4-6300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T5270A4-6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5270 and A4-6300

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5270

The Core 2 Duo T5270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A4-6300

The A4-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,436 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T5270 and A4-6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5270 versus 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300 — a 94.3% clock advantage for the A4-6300 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5270 uses the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A4-6300 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5270 scores 1,427 against the A4-6300's 1,436 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-6300. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5270 vs 0 kB on the A4-6300.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5270A4-6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
3.9 GHz+179%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+164%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,427
1,436
Geekbench 6 Single
373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5270 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-6300 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5270A4-6300
Socket
PGA478
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo T5270) / AMD-V (A4-6300). The A4-6300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Core 2 Duo T5270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300 rivals Pentium G3220.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5270A4-6300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8370D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop