Core 2 Duo T5870
VS
A6-3650

Core 2 Duo T5870 vs A6-3650

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5870

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A6-3650

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5870 is positioned at rank 538 and the A6-3650 is on rank 832, so the Core 2 Duo T5870 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5870

#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
100%
#526
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
702%
#527
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
692%
#528
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
635%
#529
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
632%
#530
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
627%
#532
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
605%
#533
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
580%
#534
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
579%
#535
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
564%
#538
Core 2 Duo T5870
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3650

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17090%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16148%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11725%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3532%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2798%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2448%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1402%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1384%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1260%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1260%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1246%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1212%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1195%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1190%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1179%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
100%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
100%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
100%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
98%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
98%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-3650 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5870 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo T5870A6-3650
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T5870A6-3650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5870 and A6-3650

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5870

The Core 2 Duo T5870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,089 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A6-3650

The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T5870 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3650 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5870 versus 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A6-3650 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5870 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-3650 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5870 scores 2,089 against the A6-3650's 2,098 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-3650. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 203 vs 311, a 42% lead for the A6-3650 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5870 vs 0 kB on the A6-3650.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5870A6-3650
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,089
2,098
Geekbench 6 Single
203
311+53%
Geekbench 6 Multi
314
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T5870 versus DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 — the A6-3650 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3650 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T5870) vs 16 (A6-3650) — the A6-3650 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T5870) and A55,A75 (A6-3650).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5870A6-3650
Socket
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3-1866+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T5870) vs AMD-V (A6-3650). The A6-3650 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T5870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5870 targets Legacy Mobile, A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T5870A6-3650
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Mobile
Budget Desktop