
Core 2 Duo T5870

Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T5870
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Quad Q8400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (314 vs 1,155).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Quad Q8400.
Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo T5870.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5870 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Quad Q8400 better than Core 2 Duo T5870?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T5870
The Core 2 Duo T5870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,089 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Quad Q8400
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T5870 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5870 versus 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8400 — a 99.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5870 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T5870 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5870 scores 2,089 against the Core 2 Quad Q8400's 2,076 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5870. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 203 vs 369, a 58% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 314 vs 1,155 (114.5% advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8400). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5870 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5870 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+199% | 0.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.66 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 2,089 | 2,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 852 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 203 | 369+82% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 314 | 1,155+268% |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T5870 versus DDR3 1333 MHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8400 — the Core 2 Quad Q8400 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Quad Q8400 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T5870) and Intel P45,Intel G41,Intel Q45,Intel X48,Intel G31 (Core 2 Quad Q8400).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5870 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3 1333 MHz+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T5870) vs true (Core 2 Quad Q8400). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5870 targets Legacy Mobile, Core 2 Quad Q8400 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5870 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Legacy Mobile | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













