A6-3650
VS
Core 2 Duo T5870

A6-3650 vs Core 2 Duo T5870

AMD

A6-3650

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5870

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3650 is positioned at rank 832 and the Core 2 Duo T5870 is on rank 538, so the Core 2 Duo T5870 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3650

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17090%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16148%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11725%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3532%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2798%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2448%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1402%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1384%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1260%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1260%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1246%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1212%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1195%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1190%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1179%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
100%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
100%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
100%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
98%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
98%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5870

#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
100%
#526
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
702%
#527
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
692%
#528
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
635%
#529
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
632%
#530
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
627%
#532
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
605%
#533
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
580%
#534
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
579%
#535
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
564%
#538
Core 2 Duo T5870
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-3650 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5870 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-3650Core 2 Duo T5870
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3650Core 2 Duo T5870
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3650 and Core 2 Duo T5870

AMD

A6-3650

The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5870

The Core 2 Duo T5870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,089 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A6-3650 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5870 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5870 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A6-3650 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-3650 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5870 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Core 2 Duo T5870's 2,089 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-3650. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 311 vs 203, a 42% lead for the A6-3650 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3650 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5870.

FeatureA6-3650Core 2 Duo T5870
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,098
2,089
Geekbench 6 Single
311+53%
203
Geekbench 6 Multi
314
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T5870 — the A6-3650 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3650 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3650) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5870) — the A6-3650 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and GM965,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T5870).

FeatureA6-3650Core 2 Duo T5870
Socket
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3650) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T5870). The A6-3650 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T5870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Duo T5870 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.

FeatureA6-3650Core 2 Duo T5870
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Legacy Mobile