A6-3650 vs Core i5-3337U

AMD

A6-3650

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-3337U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

A6-3650 vs Core i5-3337U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3650 vs Core i5-3337U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3650 vs Core i5-3337U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3650

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $110 less on MSRP ($115 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Delivers 96.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.2 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($115 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3337U.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-3337U

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,098).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).
    • 412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3650.

    Quick Answers

    So, is A6-3650 better than Core i5-3337U?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3337U is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-3650 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3650 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    A6-3650 is the better buy right now. A6-3650 comes in $110 cheaper on MSRP at $115 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-3337U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 96.1% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-3337U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A6-3650 vs Core i5-3337U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A6-3650

    The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.

    Intel

    Core i5-3337U

    The Core i5-3337U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $225.

    Processing Power

    The A6-3650 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3337U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-3337U — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3337U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-3650 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3337U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Core i5-3337U's 2,093 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-3650. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3650 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3337U.

    FeatureA6-3650Core i5-3337U
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.6 GHz
    2.7 GHz+4%
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz+44%
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    256K (per core)+25500%
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Llano (2011−2012)
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    2,098
    2,093
    Geekbench 6 Single
    311
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A6-3650 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3337U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3337U — the A6-3650 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3337U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3337U).

    FeatureA6-3650Core i5-3337U
    Socket
    FM1
    BGA1023
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1866+17%
    1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    32 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3650) vs true (Core i5-3337U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3650) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3337U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850; Core i5-3337U rivals AMD A8-4555M.

    FeatureA6-3650Core i5-3337U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon HD 6530D
    Intel HD Graphics 4000
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    true
    Target Use
    Budget Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the A6-3650 was priced at $115, while the Core i5-3337U came in at $225. On launch pricing ($115 vs $225), A6-3650 was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3650 delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3337U — making the A6-3650 the 64.9% better value option.

    FeatureA6-3650Core i5-3337U
    MSRP
    $115-49%
    $225
    Performance per Dollar
    18.2+96%
    9.3
    Release Date
    2011
    2013

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.