A6-3650 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
A6-3650
Core 2 Quad Q6700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3650 is positioned at rank 832 and the Core 2 Quad Q6700 is on rank 1079, so the A6-3650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-3650
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q6700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kentsfield (2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+151%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-3650 and Core 2 Quad Q6700
A6-3650
The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.
Core 2 Quad Q6700
The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Kentsfield (2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 8 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the A6-3650 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q6700 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The A6-3650 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses Kentsfield (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Core 2 Quad Q6700's 2,092 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-3650. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.67 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| PassMark | 2,098 | 2,092 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 311 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A6-3650 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — the A6-3650 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3650 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3650) vs 0 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) — the A6-3650 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and P45,G45 (Core 2 Quad Q6700).
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3650) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q6700). The A6-3650 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6530D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The A6-3650 launched at $115 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 debuted at $530. At current prices ($20 vs $50), the A6-3650 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3650 delivers 104.9 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q6700 — making the A6-3650 the 85.9% better value option.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $115-78% | $530 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+151% | 41.8 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-3650 and Core 2 Quad Q6700
