A6-3650 vs Core 2 Duo T6400
A6-3650
Core 2 Duo T6400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3650 is positioned at rank 832 and the Core 2 Duo T6400 is on rank 49, so the Core 2 Duo T6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-3650
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-3650 | Core 2 Duo T6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-3650 | Core 2 Duo T6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-3650 and Core 2 Duo T6400
A6-3650
The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.
Core 2 Duo T6400
The Core 2 Duo T6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,115 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A6-3650 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6400 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the A6-3650 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-3650 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Core 2 Duo T6400's 2,115 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 311 vs 650, a 70.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3650 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6400.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Duo T6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,098 | 2,115 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 311 | 650+109% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,300 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-3650 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6400 — the A6-3650 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3650 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3650) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T6400) — the A6-3650 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and Intel GM45,Intel PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6400).
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Duo T6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3650) vs No (Core 2 Duo T6400). The A6-3650 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core 2 Duo T6400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Duo T6400 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Core 2 Duo T6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6530D | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-3650 and Core 2 Duo T6400
