A6-3650
Athlon II X4 631
A6-3650 vs Athlon II X4 631 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-3650 vs Athlon II X4 631 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-3650 vs Athlon II X4 631: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-3650
2011Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6530D, while Athlon II X4 631 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon II X4 631.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,098 vs 2,118).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($115 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Athlon II X4 631
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3650 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3650.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 631 better than A6-3650?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-3650 vs Athlon II X4 631 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A6-3650
The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.
Athlon II X4 631
The Athlon II X4 631 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,118 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 631 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 631 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Athlon II X4 631's 2,118 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 631. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 2,098 | 2,118 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 311 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FM1 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 631 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 631).
| Feature | A6-3650 | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | FM1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3650) / not specified (Athlon II X4 631). The A6-3650 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Athlon II X4 631 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6530D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A6-3650 was priced at $115, while the Athlon II X4 631 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($115 vs $80), Athlon II X4 631 was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-3650 delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 631 — making the Athlon II X4 631 the 36.8% better value option.
| Feature | A6-3650 | Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $115 | $80-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 26.5+46% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-3650 and Athlon II X4 631
