A6-3650
VS
Core i7-3517U

A6-3650 vs Core i7-3517U

AMD

A6-3650

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-3517U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3650 is positioned at rank 832 and the Core i7-3517U is on rank 340, so the Core i7-3517U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3650

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17090%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16148%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11725%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3532%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2798%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2448%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1402%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1384%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1260%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1260%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1246%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1212%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1195%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1190%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1179%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
100%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
100%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
100%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
98%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
98%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3517U

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
97%
#328
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
487%
#329
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
480%
#330
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
441%
#331
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
439%
#332
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
435%
#334
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
420%
#335
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
402%
#336
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
402%
#337
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
391%
#340
Core i7-3517U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3517U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-3650 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-3650Core i7-3517U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3650Core i7-3517U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3650 and Core i7-3517U

AMD

A6-3650

The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core i7-3517U

The Core i7-3517U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,108 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-3650 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3517U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-3517U — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A6-3650 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3517U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3650 scores 2,098 against the Core i7-3517U's 2,108 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-3517U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3650 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517U.

FeatureA6-3650Core i7-3517U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3 GHz+15%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+37%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,098
2,108
Geekbench 6 Single
311
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3650 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3517U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3650 versus 1600 on the Core i7-3517U — the Core i7-3517U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3517U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3650) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3517U).

FeatureA6-3650Core i7-3517U
Socket
FM1
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+52428700%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3650) vs true (Core i7-3517U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3650) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3517U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850; Core i7-3517U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureA6-3650Core i7-3517U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Budget Desktop