Core 2 Duo T7800 vs Celeron J4115

Core 2 Duo T7800

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2007

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo T7800

2 / 2

2,663

0.0%

2,688

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Duo T7800 is positioned at rank #156 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7800

#42

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A

99%

#144

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

331%

#145

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

326%

#146

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

299%

#147

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

298%

#148

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

295%

#150

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

285%

#151

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

273%

#152

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

273%

#153

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

265%

#156

Core 2 Duo T7800

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#158

Core i5-3210M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4115 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core 2 Duo T7800	Celeron J4115
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)	✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7800 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core 2 Duo T7800	Celeron J4115
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo T7800 Benchmark Check

Celeron J4115 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7800 and Celeron J4115

Core 2 Duo T7800

The Core 2 Duo T7800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,663 points. Launch price was $515.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T7800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7800 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7800 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7800 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7800 scores 2,663 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron J4115. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7800 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4115.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T7800	Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+4%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+44%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark	2,663	2,688

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7800 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7800 versus 2400 on the Celeron J4115 — the Celeron J4115 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7800) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4115).

Feature	Core 2 Duo T7800	Celeron J4115
Socket	PGA478	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	2400+119900%
Max RAM Capacity	—	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7800) vs true (Celeron J4115). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core 2 Duo T7800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7800 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.