Core 2 Duo T8100 vs A10-6700T
Core 2 Duo T8100
A10-6700T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T8100 is positioned at rank 38 and the A10-6700T is on rank 514, so the Core 2 Duo T8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Per Dollar A10-6700T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T8100 and A10-6700T
Core 2 Duo T8100
The Core 2 Duo T8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $209.
A10-6700T
The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T8100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A10-6700T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8100 versus 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T — a 50% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T8100 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-6700T uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T8100 scores 2,320 against the A10-6700T's 2,299 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 289, a 27.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8100 vs 0 kB on the A10-6700T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4096 kB+33% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,320 | 2,299 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380+31% | 289 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T8100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A10-6700T uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T8100 versus DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700T — the A10-6700T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6700T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T8100) vs 16 (A10-6700T) — the A10-6700T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8100) and A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1866+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8100) vs AMD-V (A10-6700T). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Core 2 Duo T8100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T8100 targets Legacy Laptop, A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T8100 rivals Core 2 Duo T7250; A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 8650D |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T8100 and A10-6700T
