Core 2 Duo T8100 vs Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T8100 is positioned at rank 38 and the Core 2 Duo T7500 is on rank 88, so the Core 2 Duo T8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+99%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T8100
The Core 2 Duo T8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $209.
Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T7500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8100 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7500 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T8100 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T8100 scores 2,320 against the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2,308 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100. Multi-core Geekbench: 700 vs 507 (32% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T8100). L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8100 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,320 | 2,308 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 700+38% | 507 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8100) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T8100 targets Legacy Laptop, Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T8100 rivals Core 2 Duo T7250; Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T8100 launched at $209 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 debuted at $316. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T8100 delivers 232.0 pts/$ vs 461.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7500 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 66.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209-34% | $316 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $5-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 232.0 | 461.6+99% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T7500
