Core 2 Duo T8100 vs Core 2 Duo P7450
Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo P7450
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T8100 is positioned at rank 38 and the Core 2 Duo P7450 is on rank 15, so the Core 2 Duo P7450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7450
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo P7450
Core 2 Duo T8100
The Core 2 Duo T8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $209.
Core 2 Duo P7450
The Core 2 Duo P7450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,306 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo P7450 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8100 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7450 — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P7450 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T8100 scores 2,320 against the Core 2 Duo P7450's 2,306 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 250, a 41.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 700 vs 450 (43.5% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T8100). Both processors carry 3 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz+1% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,320 | 2,306 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380+52% | 250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 700+56% | 450 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T8100 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7450 — the Core 2 Duo P7450 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo P7450 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo T8100) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo P7450) — the Core 2 Duo P7450 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8100) and PM45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo P7450).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8100) vs Disabled (Core 2 Duo P7450). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T8100 targets Legacy Laptop, Core 2 Duo P7450 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T8100 rivals Core 2 Duo T7250.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T8100 | Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Disabled |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo P7450
