Core 2 Duo T9400
VS
Celeron 1019Y

Core 2 Duo T9400 vs Celeron 1019Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron 1019Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T9400 is positioned at rank 796 and the Celeron 1019Y is on rank 441, so the Celeron 1019Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9400

#784
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1198%
#785
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1180%
#786
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1084%
#787
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1079%
#788
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1069%
#790
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1032%
#791
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
990%
#792
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
988%
#793
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
962%
#796
Core 2 Duo T9400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1019Y

#429
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
584%
#430
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
575%
#431
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
528%
#432
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
526%
#433
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
521%
#435
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
503%
#436
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
482%
#437
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
482%
#438
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
469%
#441
Celeron 1019Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1019Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T9400Celeron 1019Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T9400Celeron 1019Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T9400 and Celeron 1019Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $316.

Intel

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T9400 and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9400 versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 86.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9400 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T9400 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T9400 scores 1,004 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9400 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9400Celeron 1019Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz+153%
1 GHz
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+153%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,004
1,005
Geekbench 6 Single
320
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T9400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9400) and HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9400Celeron 1019Y
Socket
PGA478
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo T9400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9400 targets Budget, Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9400 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9400Celeron 1019Y
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget