Core 2 Duo T9550
VS
A4-3305M

Core 2 Duo T9550 vs A4-3305M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9550

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A4-3305M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T9550 is positioned at rank 342 and the A4-3305M is on rank 691, so the Core 2 Duo T9550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9550

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
98%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
96%
#330
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
488%
#331
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
481%
#332
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
441%
#333
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
439%
#334
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
435%
#336
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
420%
#337
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
403%
#338
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
402%
#339
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
392%
#342
Core 2 Duo T9550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-3305M

#679
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
972%
#680
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
957%
#681
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
879%
#682
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
875%
#683
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
867%
#685
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
837%
#686
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
803%
#687
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
801%
#688
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
780%
#691
A4-3305M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#696
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
99%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9550 leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-3305M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T9550A4-3305M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T9550A4-3305M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T9550 and A4-3305M

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9550

The Core 2 Duo T9550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,804 points. Launch price was $316.

AMD

A4-3305M

The A4-3305M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,812 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T9550 and A4-3305M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9550 versus 2.5 GHz on the A4-3305M — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9550 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T9550 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A4-3305M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T9550 scores 1,804 against the A4-3305M's 1,812 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-3305M. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9550 vs 0 kB on the A4-3305M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9550A4-3305M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+6%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+40%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,804
1,812
Geekbench 6 Single
276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T9550 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-3305M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9550A4-3305M
Socket
PGA478
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo T9550) / AMD-V (A4-3305M). The A4-3305M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Core 2 Duo T9550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3305M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3305M rivals Pentium B950.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9550A4-3305M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6480G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop