Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo T9900

2 / 2

1,204

+0.2%

Atom E3827

Celeron 877

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,201

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T9900

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,201 vs 1,204).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9900 better than Turion 64 ML-28?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion 64 ML-28 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9900 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9900 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T9900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo T9900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T9900

The Core 2 Duo T9900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,204 points. Launch price was $530.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T9900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo T9900 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9900 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 183.2% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-28. The Core 2 Duo T9900 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T9900 scores 1,204 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9900. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9900 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T9900	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	0.07 GHz	1.6 GHz+2186%
Base Clock	3.06 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+1100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,204	1,201

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T9900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.