Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-1800

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-1800 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2 / 2

1,118

+0.7%

Celeron U3600

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,110

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,110 vs 1,118).

Quick Answers

So, is E2-1800 better than Core 2 Extreme X6800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-1800 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Extreme X6800 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Extreme X6800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-1800 still makes the most sense overall. E2-1800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Extreme X6800

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Conroe XE (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,118 points. Launch price was $999.

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Extreme X6800 and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X6800 versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the E2-1800. The Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses the Conroe XE (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X6800 scores 1,118 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Extreme X6800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core 2 Extreme X6800	E2-1800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.93 GHz	1.7 GHz+83%
Base Clock	2.933 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	512K (per core)+12700%
Process	65 nm	40 nm-38%
Architecture	Conroe XE (2006)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,118	1,110

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-1800 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.