Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-3800

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-3800 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2 / 2

1,118

0.0%

Celeron U3600

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,136

+1.6%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-3800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,118 vs 1,136).
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while E2-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

E2-3800

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8280, while Core 2 Extreme X6800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core 2 Extreme X6800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3800 better than Core 2 Extreme X6800?

Yes. E2-3800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-3800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3800 is the better buy right now. E2-3800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs E2-3800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Extreme X6800

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Conroe XE (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,118 points. Launch price was $999.

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-3800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X6800 versus 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 — a 33.2% clock advantage for the E2-3800. The Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses the Conroe XE (2006) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-3800 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X6800 scores 1,118 against the E2-3800's 1,136 — a 1.6% lead for the E2-3800.

Feature	Core 2 Extreme X6800	E2-3800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	0.93 GHz	1.3 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2.933 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2048 kB
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Conroe XE (2006)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,118	1,136+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	136
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	389

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-3800 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Extreme X6800	E2-3800
Socket	LGA775	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Extreme X6800) / Yes (E2-3800). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Core 2 Extreme X6800 requires a dedicated GPU.