Core 2 Extreme X7900
VS
Core 2 Extreme X6800

Core 2 Extreme X7900 vs Core 2 Extreme X6800

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2 Cores2 Thrd75 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is positioned at rank 1162 and the Core 2 Extreme X6800 is on rank 1042, so the Core 2 Extreme X6800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X7900

#1150
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4185%
#1151
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4124%
#1152
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3786%
#1153
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3769%
#1154
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3734%
#1156
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3606%
#1157
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3458%
#1158
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3452%
#1159
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3359%
#1162
Core 2 Extreme X7900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
97%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
93%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X6800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41841%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39536%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28706%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8648%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6850%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5992%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3432%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3387%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3084%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3084%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3050%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2967%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2926%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2914%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2888%
#1042
Core 2 Extreme X6800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
99%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
98%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
97%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
96%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
95%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
94%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
92%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
92%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
92%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
91%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
91%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
89%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
89%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Extreme X7900 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Extreme X6800 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Extreme X7900Core 2 Extreme X6800
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe XE (2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Extreme X7900Core 2 Extreme X6800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Extreme X6800

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $851.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X6800

The Core 2 Extreme X6800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Conroe XE (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,118 points. Launch price was $999.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Extreme X6800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X6800 — a 100.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X7900 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses Conroe XE (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X7900 scores 1,115 against the Core 2 Extreme X6800's 1,118 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Extreme X6800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X7900Core 2 Extreme X6800
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+201%
0.93 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.933 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Conroe XE (2006)
PassMark
1,115
1,118
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Extreme X6800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X7900Core 2 Extreme X6800
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Extreme X7900) / not specified (Core 2 Extreme X6800). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme X7900 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X7900Core 2 Extreme X6800
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile