Core 2 Extreme X9000
VS
A9-9420e

Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs A9-9420e

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X9000

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A9-9420e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Extreme X9000 is positioned at rank 915 and the A9-9420e is on rank 833, so the A9-9420e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme X9000

#903
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1589%
#904
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1565%
#905
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1437%
#906
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1430%
#907
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1417%
#909
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1369%
#910
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1312%
#911
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1310%
#912
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1275%
#915
Core 2 Extreme X9000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
99%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A9-9420e

#820
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1332%
#821
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1313%
#822
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1205%
#823
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1200%
#824
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1189%
#826
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1148%
#827
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1101%
#828
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1099%
#829
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1069%
#833
A9-9420e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A9-9420e (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Extreme X9000A9-9420e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Extreme X9000A9-9420e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X9000

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,108 points. Launch price was $851.

AMD

A9-9420e

The A9-9420e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,101 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Extreme X9000 and A9-9420e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X9000 versus 2.5 GHz on the A9-9420e — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X9000. The Core 2 Extreme X9000 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A9-9420e uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X9000 scores 1,108 against the A9-9420e's 1,101 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Extreme X9000.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X9000A9-9420e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+12%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
6 MB+500%
1 MB
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,108
1,101
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A9-9420e uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X9000A9-9420e
Socket
PGA478
BGA
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Extreme X9000) / true (A9-9420e). The A9-9420e includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core 2 Extreme X9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A9-9420e rivals Pentium N4200.

FeatureCore 2 Extreme X9000A9-9420e
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true