
Core 2 Extreme X9100

Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Extreme X9100
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 44W instead of 95W, a 51W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,063 vs 2,076).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($851 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Quad Q8400.
Core 2 Quad Q8400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $668 less on MSRP ($183 MSRP vs $851 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 368.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($183 MSRP vs $851 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Extreme X9100.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 44W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Quad Q8400 better than Core 2 Extreme X9100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Extreme X9100 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Extreme X9100
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn XE (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $851.

Core 2 Quad Q8400
The Core 2 Quad Q8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X9100 versus 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8400 — a 162.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8400 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Extreme X9100 uses the Penryn XE (2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Extreme X9100 scores 2,063 against the Core 2 Quad Q8400's 2,076 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 0.67 GHz+857% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz+15% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn XE (2008) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 2,063 | 2,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 852 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 369 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Extreme X9100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3 1333 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Extreme X9100) / true (Core 2 Quad Q8400). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8400 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Extreme X9100 was priced at $851, while the Core 2 Quad Q8400 came in at $183. On launch pricing ($851 vs $183), Core 2 Quad Q8400 was $668 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Extreme X9100 delivers 2.4 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8400 — making the Core 2 Quad Q8400 the 129.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Extreme X9100 | Core 2 Quad Q8400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $851 | $183-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 11.3+371% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














