Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Phenom II X4 B93

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9400

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 B93

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Phenom II X4 B93 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Phenom II X4 B93 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Phenom II X4 B93: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9400

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 B93 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 B93

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Quad Q9400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (2,159 vs 2,160).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core 2 Quad Q9400 better than Phenom II X4 B93?
    Yes. Core 2 Quad Q9400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Quad Q9400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q9400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core 2 Quad Q9400 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Quad Q9400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $229 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Phenom II X4 B93 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Phenom II X4 B93 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Quad Q9400

    The Core 2 Quad Q9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,160 points. Launch price was $249.

    AMD

    Phenom II X4 B93

    The Phenom II X4 B93 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009βˆ’2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,159 points. Launch price was $149.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Phenom II X4 B93 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9400 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B93 β€” a 4.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 B93 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9400 uses the Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B93 uses Deneb (2009βˆ’2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9400 scores 2,160 against the Phenom II X4 B93's 2,159 β€” a 0% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9400. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B93.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9400Phenom II X4 B93
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.67 GHz
    2.8 GHz+5%
    Base Clock
    2.66 GHz
    2.8 GHz+5%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    6 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    6 MB (total)+1100%
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009)
    Deneb (2009βˆ’2011)
    PassMark
    2,160
    2,159
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 2 Quad Q9400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 B93 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9400Phenom II X4 B93
    Socket
    LGA775
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9400) / not specified (Phenom II X4 B93). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9400 targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9400Phenom II X4 B93
    Integrated GPU
    No
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    β€”
    Target Use
    Desktop
    β€”