Core 3 100U
VS
Ryzen 3 210

Core 3 100U vs Ryzen 3 210

Intel

Core 3 100U

6 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 3 100U

#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
108%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
107%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
102%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
100%
#121
Core 3 100U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core 3 100U shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore 3 100URyzen 3 210
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 3 100URyzen 3 210
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100U and Ryzen 3 210

Intel

Core 3 100U

The Core 3 100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,312 points. Launch price was $426.

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100U packs 6 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 210 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 3 100U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core 3 100U versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100U scores 13,312 against the Ryzen 3 210's 13,209 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 3 100U. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core 3 100U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210.

FeatureCore 3 100URyzen 3 210
Cores / Threads
6 / 8+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3 GHz+150%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
13,312
13,209
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 100URyzen 3 210
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core 3 100U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureCore 3 100URyzen 3 210
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop