Core Duo T2300
VS
A4-5300

Core Duo T2300 vs A4-5300

Intel

Core Duo T2300

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006
VS
AMD

A4-5300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2300 is positioned at rank 55 and the A4-5300 is on rank 731, so the Core Duo T2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2300

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
97%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#43
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
213%
#44
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#45
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#46
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#47
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
190%
#49
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#50
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
176%
#51
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#52
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
171%
#55
Core Duo T2300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13684%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12930%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9388%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2828%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2240%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1960%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1122%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1108%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1009%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1009%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
997%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
970%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
957%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
953%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
944%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#731
A4-5300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
100%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-5300 (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Duo T2300A4-5300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Duo T2300A4-5300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2300 and A4-5300

Intel

Core Duo T2300

The Core Duo T2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,380 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2300 and A4-5300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Duo T2300 versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 — a 73.8% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Duo T2300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the A4-5300 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2300 scores 1,380 against the A4-5300's 1,367 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Duo T2300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Duo T2300A4-5300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.66 GHz
3.6 GHz+117%
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
3.4 GHz+105%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,380
1,367
Geekbench 6 Single
372
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-5300 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Duo T2300A4-5300
Socket
PGA478
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Duo T2300) / AMD-V (A4-5300). The A4-5300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Core Duo T2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.

FeatureCore Duo T2300A4-5300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop