
Core Duo T2700

Core i3-2310E
Core Duo T2700 vs Core i3-2310E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Duo T2700 vs Core i3-2310E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Duo T2700 vs Core i3-2310E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Duo T2700
2006Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($663 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2310E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-2310E
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $438 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $663 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 192.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 2.8 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $663 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core Duo T2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,845 vs 1,860).
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Duo T2700 better than Core i3-2310E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Duo T2700 vs Core i3-2310E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2700
The Core Duo T2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,860 points. Launch price was $663.

Core i3-2310E
The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Core Duo T2700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2310E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core Duo T2700 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E — a 10.4% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2700 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Duo T2700 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2310E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2700 scores 1,860 against the Core i3-2310E's 1,845 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Duo T2700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2700 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2310E.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | Core i3-2310E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.33 GHz+11% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz+11% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,860 | 1,845 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Duo T2700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2310E uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2700 versus 1333 on the Core i3-2310E — the Core i3-2310E supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2310E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core Duo T2700) vs 16 (Core i3-2310E) — the Core i3-2310E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 945GM,945PM,945GME (Core Duo T2700) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2310E).
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | Core i3-2310E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | 1333+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core Duo T2700) vs true (Core i3-2310E). The Core i3-2310E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core Duo T2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2700 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2700 rivals Core 2 Duo T5600; Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | Core i3-2310E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Duo T2700 was priced at $663, while the Core i3-2310E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($663 vs $225), Core i3-2310E was $438 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Duo T2700 delivers 2.8 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-2310E — making the Core i3-2310E the 98% better value option.
| Feature | Core Duo T2700 | Core i3-2310E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $663 | $225-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 8.2+193% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














