Core Duo T2700
VS
PRO A6-9500

Core Duo T2700 vs PRO A6-9500

Intel

Core Duo T2700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006
VS
AMD

PRO A6-9500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2700 is positioned at rank 1233 and the PRO A6-9500 is on rank 526, so the PRO A6-9500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2700

#1221
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
10441%
#1222
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
10288%
#1223
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
9445%
#1224
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
9402%
#1225
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
9316%
#1227
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
8996%
#1228
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
8626%
#1229
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
8612%
#1230
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
8381%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
100%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
84%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
76%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
74%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
72%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
65%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A6-9500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8321%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7863%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5709%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1720%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1362%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1192%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
683%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
674%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
613%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
613%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
606%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
590%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
582%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
580%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
574%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
99%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
95%
#526
PRO A6-9500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#527
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
100%
#528
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
99%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
99%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
98%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
97%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
96%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The PRO A6-9500 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Duo T2700PRO A6-9500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2700 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Duo T2700PRO A6-9500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2700 and PRO A6-9500

Intel

Core Duo T2700

The Core Duo T2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,860 points. Launch price was $663.

AMD

PRO A6-9500

The PRO A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,873 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core Duo T2700 and PRO A6-9500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.33 GHz on the Core Duo T2700 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-9500 — a 48% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Duo T2700 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the PRO A6-9500 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2700 scores 1,860 against the PRO A6-9500's 1,873 — a 0.7% lead for the PRO A6-9500.

FeatureCore Duo T2700PRO A6-9500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.33 GHz
3.8 GHz+63%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
3.5 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,860
1,873
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the PRO A6-9500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Duo T2700PRO A6-9500
Socket
PGA478
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core Duo T2700) / not specified (PRO A6-9500). Primary use case: Core Duo T2700 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2700 rivals Core 2 Duo T5600.

FeatureCore Duo T2700PRO A6-9500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop