Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Intel

Core i3-10100

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10100

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $71 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 58.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.9 vs 44.2 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (8,526 vs 8,527).

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.2 vs 69.9 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10100.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10100 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10100 is ahead with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Core i3-10100 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-10100 comes in $71 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 58.2% better value on MSRP (69.9 vs 44.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10100

The Core i3-10100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,526 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β€” a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-10100 uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100 scores 8,526 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 β€” a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10100 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

FeatureCore i3-10100Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+10%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-S (2020)
Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019)
PassMark
8,526
8,527
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,612
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
1,430
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,300
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10100 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10100Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10100) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). The Core i3-10100 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10100 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-10100 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureCore i3-10100Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
β€”
Target Use
Gaming
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10100 was priced at $122, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($122 vs $193), Core i3-10100 was $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100 delivers 69.9 pts/$ vs 44.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β€” making the Core i3-10100 the 45.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10100Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP
$122-37%
$193
Performance per Dollar
69.9+58%
44.2
Release Date
2020
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.