
Core i3-10305

Ryzen 5 3400G
Core i3-10305 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10305 vs Ryzen 5 3400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10305 vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10305
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 3400G needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 3400G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,201 vs 9,210).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10305.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10305 better than Ryzen 5 3400G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10305 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10305
The Core i3-10305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,210 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3400G
The Ryzen 5 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,201 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10305 and Ryzen 5 3400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-10305 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400G — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-10305 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-10305 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400G uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10305 scores 9,210 against the Ryzen 5 3400G's 9,201 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-10305. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400G.
| Feature | Core i3-10305 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 9,210 | 9,201 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10305 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10305 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10305) / not specified (Ryzen 5 3400G). The Core i3-10305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 3400G requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-10305 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10305 was priced at $149, while the Ryzen 5 3400G came in at $149. On launch pricing ($149 vs $149), Ryzen 5 3400G was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10305 delivers 61.8 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400G — making the Core i3-10305 the 0.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10305 | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8 | 61.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













