Core i3-10305 vs Xeon D-1715TER

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10305 vs Xeon D-1715TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10305 vs Xeon D-1715TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10305

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1715TER needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1715TER.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon D-1715TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Xeon D-1715TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,104 vs 9,210).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10305.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10305 better than Xeon D-1715TER?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10305 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10305 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10305 is the better buy right now. Core i3-10305 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1715TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10305 vs Xeon D-1715TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10305

The Core i3-10305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,210 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1715TER

The Xeon D-1715TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,104 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10305 and Xeon D-1715TER share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-10305 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1715TER — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i3-10305 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-10305 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1715TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10305 scores 9,210 against the Xeon D-1715TER's 9,104 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-10305. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1715TER.

Feature	Core i3-10305	Xeon D-1715TER
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+29%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	9,210+1%	9,104
Geekbench 6 Single	1,536	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10305 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1715TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10305	Xeon D-1715TER
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10305) / not specified (Xeon D-1715TER). The Core i3-10305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1715TER requires a dedicated GPU.