Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 4300G

Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 4300G Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10320

4 / 8

9,972

+0.3%

9,938

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 4300G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 4300G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10320

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌
3.4% HIGHER MSRP
$154 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌40% higher power demand at 91W vs 65W.

Ryzen 3 4300G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 91W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,938 vs 9,972).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10320 better than Ryzen 3 4300G?

Yes. Core i3-10320 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10320 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i3-10320 comes in 3.4% more expensive on MSRP at $154 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 4300G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 9,938 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10320 vs Ryzen 3 4300G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10320

The Core i3-10320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,972 points. Launch price was $162.

Ryzen 3 4300G

The Ryzen 3 4300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 9,938 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10320 and Ryzen 3 4300G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i3-10320 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300G — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i3-10320 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-10320 uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 4300G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10320 scores 9,972 against the Ryzen 3 4300G's 9,938 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-10320. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10320 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300G.

Feature	Core i3-10320	Ryzen 3 4300G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-S (2020)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	9,972	9,938

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10320 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 4300G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10320	Ryzen 3 4300G
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10320 was priced at $154, while the Ryzen 3 4300G came in at $149. On launch pricing ($154 vs $149), Ryzen 3 4300G was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10320 delivers 64.8 pts/$ vs 66.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 4300G — making the Ryzen 3 4300G the 3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10320	Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP	$154	$149-3%
Performance per Dollar	64.8	66.7+3%
Release Date	2020	2020

Search Core i3-10320 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 4300G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.