
Core i3-10320 vs Xeon E7450

Core i3-10320

Xeon E7450
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10320
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7450
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-10320 | Xeon E7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-S (2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-10320 | Xeon E7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+74%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10320 and Xeon E7450

Core i3-10320
The Core i3-10320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,972 points. Launch price was $162.

Xeon E7450
The Xeon E7450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 9,932 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10320 is built on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10320 scores 9,972 against the Xeon E7450's 9,932 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-10320. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10320 vs 12 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon E7450.
| Feature | Core i3-10320 | Xeon E7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB L3 Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-S (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 9,972 | 9,932 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10320 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7450 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10320 | Xeon E7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-10320 launched at $154 MSRP, while the Xeon E7450 debuted at $417. At current prices ($140 vs $80), the Xeon E7450 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10320 delivers 71.2 pts/$ vs 124.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E7450 — making the Xeon E7450 the 54.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10320 | Xeon E7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $154-63% | $417 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140 | $80-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.2 | 124.2+74% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















