Core i3-2100T vs Celeron G1620T
Core i3-2100T
Celeron G1620T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2100T is positioned at rank 962 and the Celeron G1620T is on rank 533, so the Celeron G1620T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2100T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1620T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($127) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+747%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($127) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2100T and Celeron G1620T
Core i3-2100T
The Core i3-2100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,531 points. Launch price was $180.
Celeron G1620T
The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Core i3-2100T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1620T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-2100T versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-2100T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-2100T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1620T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2100T scores 1,531 against the Celeron G1620T's 1,532 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1620T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2100T vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620T.
| Feature | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,531 | 1,532 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 374 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 701 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-2100T) / VT-x (Celeron G1620T). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core i3-2100T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.
| Feature | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-2100T launched at $127 MSRP, while the Celeron G1620T debuted at $42. At current prices ($127 vs $15), the Celeron G1620T is $112 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-2100T delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 102.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G1620T — making the Celeron G1620T the 157.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-2100T | Celeron G1620T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $127 | $42-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $127 | $15-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.1 | 102.1+744% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-2100T and Celeron G1620T
