Core i3-2312M
VS
Pentium E5800

Core i3-2312M vs Pentium E5800

Intel

Core i3-2312M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium E5800

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2312M is positioned at rank 1200 and the Pentium E5800 is on rank 821, so the Pentium E5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2312M

#1188
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5557%
#1189
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5475%
#1190
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5027%
#1191
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5004%
#1192
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4958%
#1194
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4788%
#1195
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4591%
#1196
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4583%
#1197
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4460%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
97%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
97%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
96%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
96%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
94%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
92%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
92%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
90%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
90%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16768%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15844%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11504%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3466%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2745%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2402%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1375%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1358%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1236%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1236%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1222%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1189%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1173%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1168%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1157%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium E5800 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-2312M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium E5800 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 93% cheaper ($15 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1401%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2312M and Pentium E5800

Intel

Core i3-2312M

The Core i3-2312M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Pentium E5800

The Pentium E5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 November 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $68.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2312M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E5800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2312M versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E5800 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E5800 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-2312M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E5800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2312M scores 1,189 against the Pentium E5800's 1,190 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium E5800. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2312M vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5800.

FeatureCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+52%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,189
1,190
Geekbench 6 Multi
731
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2312M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-2312M) / not specified (Pentium E5800). The Core i3-2312M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium E5800 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-2312M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Pentium E5800 debuted at $64.

FeatureCore i3-2312MPentium E5800
MSRP
$225
$64-72%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2011
2010