Core i3-2332M vs Core i3-4010Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2332M vs Core i3-4010Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2332M vs Core i3-4010Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2332M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,353 vs 1,358).

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010Y better than Core i3-2332M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2332M is ahead with 69.2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2332M vs Core i3-4010Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2332M

The Core i3-2332M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2332M and Core i3-4010Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2332M versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-2332M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-2332M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4010Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2332M scores 1,353 against the Core i3-4010Y's 1,358 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2332M	Core i3-4010Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+69%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,353	1,358
Geekbench 6 Single	369	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2332M uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2332M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y — the Core i3-4010Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2332M) vs 12 (Core i3-4010Y) — the Core i3-2332M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-2332M	Core i3-4010Y
Socket	G2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2332M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2332M) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4010Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2332M targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i3-2332M rivals A6-3400M.