Core i3-2332M vs Xeon L3110

Intel

Core i3-2332M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon L3110

45 WW2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-2332M vs Xeon L3110 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2332M vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2332M vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2332M

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon L3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,338 vs 1,353).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while Core i3-2332M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2332M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2332M better than Xeon L3110?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-2332M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2332M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2332M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-2332M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L3110 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-2332M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon L3110 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-2332M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2332M vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-2332M

The Core i3-2332M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2332M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-2332M scores 1,353 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-2332M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2332M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L3110.

FeatureCore i3-2332MXeon L3110
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,353+1%
1,338
Geekbench 6 Single
369
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2332M uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-2332MXeon L3110
Socket
G2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2332M) / not specified (Xeon L3110). The Core i3-2332M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon L3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2332M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2332M rivals A6-3400M.

FeatureCore i3-2332MXeon L3110
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Laptop