Core i3-3217U vs E2-6110

Core i3-3217U vs E2-6110 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-3217U

2 / 4

1,226

0.0%

1,234

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3217U vs E2-6110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3217U vs E2-6110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3217U

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while E2-6110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,226 vs 1,234).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

E2-6110

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3217U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-6110 better than Core i3-3217U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-3217U is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-6110 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-6110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-6110 still makes the most sense overall. E2-6110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-6110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-3217U vs E2-6110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3217U

The Core i3-3217U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,226 points. Launch price was $225.

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3217U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the E2-6110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-6110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core i3-3217U versus 1.5 GHz on the E2-6110 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3217U. The Core i3-3217U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-6110 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3217U scores 1,226 against the E2-6110's 1,234 — a 0.7% lead for the E2-6110.

Feature	Core i3-3217U	E2-6110
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+20%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Beema (2014)
PassMark	1,226	1,234

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3217U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-6110 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-3217U	E2-6110
Socket	BGA1023	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-3217U) / not specified (E2-6110). The Core i3-3217U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the E2-6110 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3217U rivals AMD A6-4455M.