
Core i3-3217UE

Pentium N3710
Core i3-3217UE vs Pentium N3710 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3217UE vs Pentium N3710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-3217UE vs Pentium N3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3217UE
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Pentium N3710 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium N3710 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,362 vs 1,386).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.
Pentium N3710
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3217UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium N3710 better than Core i3-3217UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3217UE vs Pentium N3710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3217UE
The Core i3-3217UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,362 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium N3710
The Pentium N3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,386 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3217UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium N3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-3217UE versus 2.56 GHz on the Pentium N3710 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3710. The Core i3-3217UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3710 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3217UE scores 1,362 against the Pentium N3710's 1,386 — a 1.7% lead for the Pentium N3710. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3217UE vs 0 kB on the Pentium N3710.
| Feature | Core i3-3217UE | Pentium N3710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.56 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,362 | 1,386+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 353 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 790 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3217UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-3217UE | Pentium N3710 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-3217UE) / not specified (Pentium N3710). The Core i3-3217UE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium N3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3217UE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i3-3217UE | Pentium N3710 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3217UE was priced at $225, while the Pentium N3710 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($225 vs $161), Pentium N3710 was $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3217UE delivers 6.1 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Pentium N3710 — making the Pentium N3710 the 34.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3217UE | Pentium N3710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $161-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 8.6+41% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














