
Core i3-3220

Xeon E3-1220L
Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E3-1220L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E3-1220L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Destiny 2

Fortnite

Phasmophobia

Red Dead Redemption 2

Throne and Liberty
Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E3-1220L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3220
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 62.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Xeon E3-1220L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E3-1220L
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-3220 across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,263 vs 2,276).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3220.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3220 better than Xeon E3-1220L?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E3-1220L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3220
The Core i3-3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $117.

Xeon E3-1220L
The Xeon E3-1220L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,263 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-3220 and Xeon E3-1220L share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3220 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L — a 3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220L (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-3220 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3220 scores 2,276 against the Xeon E3-1220L's 2,263 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-3220. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-3220 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,276 | 2,263 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 503 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i3-3220 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220L). The Core i3-3220 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E3-1220L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3220 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220 rivals FX-4300.
| Feature | Core i3-3220 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3220 was priced at $117, while the Xeon E3-1220L came in at $189. On launch pricing ($117 vs $189), Core i3-3220 was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3220 delivers 19.5 pts/$ vs 12.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220L — making the Core i3-3220 the 47.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3220 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-38% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.5+63% | 12.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














