
Athlon II X4 640

Core i3-3220
Athlon II X4 640 vs Core i3-3220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 640 vs Core i3-3220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 640 vs Core i3-3220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 640
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (386 vs 503).
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,266 vs 2,276).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-3220
2012Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Athlon II X4 640 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 28.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3220 better than Athlon II X4 640?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 640 vs Core i3-3220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 640
The Athlon II X4 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,266 points. Launch price was $80.

Core i3-3220
The Core i3-3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,276 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 640 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 640 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-3220 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Athlon II X4 640 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-3220 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 640 scores 2,266 against the Core i3-3220's 2,276 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 386 vs 503, a 26.3% lead for the Core i3-3220 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 640 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,266 | 2,276 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,471 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 386 | 503+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,332 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 640 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 640 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3220 — the Core i3-3220 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3220 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X4 640) and B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 640) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220). The Core i3-3220 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Athlon II X4 640 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 640 targets Budget, Core i3-3220 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 640 rivals Core 2 Quad Q8300; Core i3-3220 rivals FX-4300.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 2500 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 640 was priced at $80, while the Core i3-3220 came in at $117. On launch pricing ($80 vs $117), Athlon II X4 640 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 640 delivers 28.3 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-3220 — making the Athlon II X4 640 the 37.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-32% | $117 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.3+45% | 19.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















