
Athlon II X4 640

Xeon E3-1220L
Athlon II X4 640 vs Xeon E3-1220L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 640 vs Xeon E3-1220L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Destiny 2

Fortnite
Athlon II X4 640 vs Xeon E3-1220L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 640
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $109 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- β Delivers 136.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.3 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1220L.
Trade-offs
- β375% higher power demand at 95W vs 20W.
Xeon E3-1220L
2011Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 95W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 640 across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,263 vs 2,266).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 28.3 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 640.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 640 better than Xeon E3-1220L?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 640 vs Xeon E3-1220L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 640
The Athlon II X4 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009β2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,266 points. Launch price was $80.

Xeon E3-1220L
The Xeon E3-1220L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,263 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 640 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220L offers 2 cores / 4 threads β the Athlon II X4 640 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 640 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L β a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220L (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 640 uses the Propus (2009β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 640 scores 2,266 against the Xeon E3-1220L's 2,263 β a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X4 640. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 640 vs 3 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220L.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009β2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 2,266 | 2,263 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,471 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 386 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,332 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 640 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 640) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220L). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 640 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 640 rivals Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 640 was priced at $80, while the Xeon E3-1220L came in at $189. On launch pricing ($80 vs $189), Athlon II X4 640 was $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 640 delivers 28.3 pts/$ vs 12.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220L β making the Athlon II X4 640 the 81.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Xeon E3-1220L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-58% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.3+136% | 12.0 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















