
Athlon II X4 640

Athlon X4 730
Athlon II X4 640 vs Athlon X4 730 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 640 vs Athlon X4 730 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock
Athlon II X4 640 vs Athlon X4 730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 640
2010Why buy it
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 730.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,266 vs 2,278).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 28.3 vs 38.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Athlon X4 730
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- β Delivers 34.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.0 vs 28.3 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 640.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 730 better than Athlon II X4 640?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 640 vs Athlon X4 730 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 640
The Athlon II X4 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009β2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,266 points. Launch price was $80.

Athlon X4 730
The Athlon X4 730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon X4 730 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 640 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 730 β a 6.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 730 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X4 640 uses the Propus (2009β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X4 730 uses Trinity (2012β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 640 scores 2,266 against the Athlon X4 730's 2,278 β a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X4 730.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | β |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009β2011) | Trinity (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 2,266 | 2,278 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,471 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 386 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,332 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 640 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 730 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 640 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 730 β the Athlon X4 730 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 730 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X4 640) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 730).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1866+40% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 640) / not specified (Athlon X4 730). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 640 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 640 rivals Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 640 was priced at $80, while the Athlon X4 730 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($80 vs $60), Athlon X4 730 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 640 delivers 28.3 pts/$ vs 38.0 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 730 β making the Athlon X4 730 the 29.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 640 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $60-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.3 | 38.0+34% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















